Can culling noisy miners benefit threatened woodland birds?
Project Leaders: Peter Vesk, Damian Michael
Research in Brief
In recent decades across eastern Australia, noisy miner populations have expanded in fragmented agricultural landscapes. A communal, non-migratory, bird
of considerable size (approximately 70g), they have aggressively outcompeted many other smaller species of native woodland birds.
So concerning is this decline that in 2014, aggressive exclusion of woodland birds from potential habitat by noisy miners was listed as a Key Threatening
Process under the EPBC Act.
This project will determine if culling is an effective method to manage the impacts of noisy miners on threatened woodland birds.
The noisy miner
Why is the research needed?
cull under way.
Photo: Jenny Pierson
The noisy miner is possibly Australia’s most successful native bird species. However, its success has been at the expense of many other species of
woodland birds, including several threatened species.
Noisy miners favour small (under 300 ha) patches of eucalypt woodland with minimal understorey and a grass ground layer. This type of habitat is created
when native woodlands are used for grazing. Consequently, the agricultural landscapes of eastern Australia provide perfect habitat for this aggressive
native species, and their numbers have exploded.
Habitat restoration (i.e., re-establishing understorey layers) is believed to be the best way to reverse the dominance of the noisy miner in these
landscapes. However, this is expensive and time-consuming; it is not well understood how to achieve enduring restoration cost-effectively; and such
restoration on farmland can reduce its economic value. It is therefore unlikely that restoration will be able to save many species of woodland bird
currently in decline.
Culling noisy miners is therefore often proposed as a practical way to prevent extinctions of some of the most impacted threatened small woodland birds.
However, the impact of culling on the success, in particular the breeding success, of small woodland birds is as yet unknown.
How will the research help?
Top image: Noisy Miner. Photo: Pete Richman_CC by 2.0_Flickr
This project will tackle a key driver of biodiversity decline in threatened temperate grassy box gum woodlands that has not previously been examined, namely
the pervasive impacts of the noisy miner on an array of threatened woodland birds. Population reduction of the hyper-aggressive native noisy miner
has been widely advocated, but its effectiveness is not known and indeed such practices have had perverse effects in other contexts.
This project will use an experimental cull of noisy miners and additional modelling to determine if culling is an effective method to manage the impacts
of noisy miners on threatened woodland birds, and what effects there are on ecosystem function overall.
The project will likely produce new insights into how best to control the impacts of noisy miners within these critical habitats.
Richard Beggs setting up a motion detection camera to monitor predation rates of an artificial nest. Photo: Richard Beggs
What research activities are being undertaken?
In the winter of 2016, noisy miners were removed by shooting from eight small (average 13ha) patches of remnant box gum woodland on farms
in the South West Slopes Bioregion of NSW.
Eight matched sites on the same farms were used as control sites. The project aimed to assess any improvement in availability of resources to small
woodland birds following the cull.
Numbers and foraging behaviour of small woodland birds were monitored in all sites in the 2015 pre-cull breeding season and the 2016 post-cull breeding
In addition, the amount of harassment of small woodland birds by aggressive species was measured to see if the cull reduced the overall amount of harassment.
With a view to seeing if the cull improved breeding opportunities for small woodland birds, artificial nest predation experiments were conducted before
Noisy miners impact small woodland birds when even a few are present in sites. To be successful, a cull therefore needs to reduce the population to
very low levels.
The cull, however, achieved only a 13% reduction in the number of noisy miners in treatment sites in the breeding season following the cull. This was
due to almost immediate recolonization from adjoining areas. It remains to be seen if this slight reduction in population has had any ecological benefits.
Who is involved?
The project is being led by the Fenner School of Environment and Society at the Australian National University.
It was also supported by Birdlife Australia, The Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment & The Ecological Society of Australia.
Where is the research happening?
The field trial is occurring in the South Western Slopes bioregion of New South Wales.
The results will be applicable to cleared and grazed woodland landscapes across eastern Australia.
When is the research happening?
The project is running from 2016 to 2019.
For more information please contact Richard Beggs - email@example.com