Hundreds of thousands of Australian species are so poorly known that their risk of extinction cannot be determined.
These species cannot be categorised as threatened or not under Australia’s EPBC (Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation) Act, and are therefore afforded no conservation protection under the legislation.
Research under Project 5.2 aims to investigate and propose a range of policy and legislative options to better protect these species from extinction, despite limited knowledge about them.
Such legislative options may include a more thorough implementation of the precautionary principle and the inclusion of a “Data Deficient” category in the EPBC Act, which would align Australian legislation with the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Red List.
This project will also explore how new tools in the fields of expert elicitation and machine learning can be used to predict which of these poorly known species are most likely to be threatened. It seeks to generalise and develop sound protocols from the specific cases presented in a recent application of expert elicitation used to guide conservation status assessments for poorly known species.
New analytical approaches, such as Machine Learning have recently been used to predict the conservation status of poorly known species by training a set of mathematical algorithms using data on 'data sufficient' species. This new approach may also be explored under this project in order to help to redress the taxonomic bias in conservation assessments.
A range of stakeholders in the Australian Department of the Environment and Energy, in state and territory conservation agencies and the Threatened Species Scientific Committee are integral to this project.
The focus is Australia wide, and for both flora and fauna across all taxonomic groups.
Image: Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides by Harry Rose/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)
Professor John Woinarski of Charles Darwin University discusses the importance of averting extinctions of less charismatic animals.
The 2019–20 wildfires have severely impacted animals of all major species groups. Here, national experts on mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and freshwater fish and crayfish present some of the key challenges for each group and how these will influence management and research priorities in the aftermath of the fires.
Cultural fire management is the way that Indigenous people have used fire to care for Country for thousands of years, and it continues today. The devastation wreaked by the 2019–20 bushfires across millions of hectares was a wake-up call for Australia and the world. Oliver Costello from the Firesticks Alliance explains how the fires demonstrated the need to listen to and care for Country.
Australia has one of the highest rates of plant endemism of any country globally. After the catastrophic fire season of 2019–20, Dr Rachael Gallagher and Professor David Keith are leading two teams to find out which species and ecological communities are most in need of immediate recovery.
The 2019–20 bushfires burnt over 12 million hectares of south-eastern and south-western Australia, causing abrupt losses of biodiversity at a scale never seen before. Over a billion animals were estimated to have died, but the figure is likely much higher. The Australian Government’s Wildlife and Threatened Species Bushfire Recovery Expert Panel is guiding the work of prioritising species and ecological communities for emergency interventions and determining what those actions should be. Hub Deputy Director and Expert Panel member Professor Sarah Legge takes us though the hows and whys of this prioritisation, and some of its challenges.